Showing posts with label Wes Welker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wes Welker. Show all posts

Thursday, March 15, 2012

MSM: Can't let emotion get in the way of a Welker deal, The Sequel

From the vaults here on January 26, 2011:

Here's the deal folks: You don't want to sign Wes Welker to a long term deal after next season. He is not a franchise receiver. He's a slot receiver and returner who has gotten the hell knocked out of him in his career. He's what I call a "TMU", (True Mileage Unknown). Special teams is a vicious life, and I am willing to bet it's taken years off his career.

Also, I look at a similar receiver in terms of how he played (on offense), Wayne Chrebet of the New York Jets. Yes, I know, his career was cut short by concussions, but he played a similar role to Welker during his playing days (offensively), and Chrebet was a returner for only two seasons of his career, 1996 and 1997. From 1995 to 2002 (including the 1997 season when Chrebet only started one game) Chrebet played in 121 reg season games and had 437 catches. Since Welker started playing offense in 2005 w/ Miami, he's played in 92 regular season games with 528 catches, and was a primary returner from 2004-2009 (he had 5 returns in 2010). He's also coming off of an ACL injury, and it's not a stretch to say it affected his season and might have hurt his career in general. The majority of the best years of his career are in all likelihood behind him (save for a big contract year in 2011).

Folks, do you REALLY want a 31 year-old slot receiver with a surgically repaired knee tied up long-term? Really? I know most of you are in love with the guy, and I understand that, but look at the receiving corps of the two (recent) Super Bowl participants now: Donald Driver can still get deep, which has never been a strong suit for Welker, and Hines Ward is signed through 2013 (PS his reception total dropped this year from 95 last year to 59 this year). Do you see any other wide-outs on the opposite end of 30?


Welker responded with statistically his best season (dare I say "contract year"). While the Chrebet comparison is good, here's another one that hits even closer to home: Troy Brown.

In Troy Brown's ninth season (just like Welker in his eighth), Brown had his best statistical year ever: 101 catches, 1199 yards, 5 tds and a Super Bowl win. Here are his stats from the first 9 years:




Welker's total numbers are better (which reflects a different offense and different era), but both players took basically the same career track in their first 124 receptions: Two years of primarily special teams, then special teams + receiving, then primarily receiving (and matching the exact same number of catches with 124.












Greg Bedard in the Boston Globe today suggested: "Basically, what would be fair for Welker is something in the ballpark of $40 million over four years with $22 million guaranteed."

The question of course is simple: is Welker from here on out worth $22 million guaranteed?

Again, we look at Troy Brown after his pinnacle year, 2001. From 2002 to 2007:











The drops in both yards, catches and games played are significant from 2002 on. Could Welker have a better year next year? Of course he could. History tells us, however, that the decline is on the horizon. Is it worth $22 million guaranteed when you already have Welker-lite in Julian Edelman on the roster, and possibly have Welker 2.0 in Danny Amendola on the way? Is Welker the reason the offense is so efficient, or is the offense the reason Welker has such great numbers? Welker is due $9.4 million this year if he signs the franchise tender. In the era of salary cap football, it's tough to gamble on a slot receiver with high miles. You don't pay the baker for the wedding cakes he already made, you pay him for the one he is making for you. How many more cakes does Welker have left in the oven?

Sunday, January 03, 2010

Monday Weekend Wrap-Up



Monday Maledictions will be up later, but for now let's get to some links from this past weekend's sports action.

  • The Black Bears had a great weekend on the hardwood. On Saturday the men knocked off Boston College 52-51 and improved to 7-5 on the season. The women, not to be outdone, knocked off UMass 65-49 on Sunday afternoon.
  • Jhonas Enroth made 39 saves for the Pirates and shut-out Providence.
  • Jason Bay apparently agreed to his deal with the Mets on Christmas. His physical with the Mets is today.
  • The Patriots lost Wes Welker for a very long time with an acl/mcl tear early, played good for three quarters on the road against a good Texans team, then fell apart in the fourth quarter. They finish the year 10-6 and will play the Ravens Sunday at 1.
  • The Bruins agreed to a deal with veteran Miroslav Satan, and Milan Lucic is practicing again.
  • The Maine Red Claws are out in Boise for the D-League showcase.
  • The great Mike Emrick joined Jeff and myself to recap the Winter Classic this weekend.
For up to the minute interaction, news, and the like, follow Matty and Jeff on Twitter.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Wednesday We-View

A fairly light night, but links can be found anywhere.

  • UMaine men's basketball gave a great effort against UConn before the Huskies pulled away in the second half. Terrance Mitchell had 13 points to lead the Black Bears, who fell to 5-5 on the season. They are off for the next 7 days before taking on Columbia.
  • Kevin Garnett was a late scratch with a thigh injury (or a sore knee, depending on who you believe) and Paul Pierce's offense didn't show up until the second half, but luckily they managed to come back and beat the Pacers 103-94. Garnett was out as a "precaution" according to Danny Ainge, but his status for Friday's game against Orlando remains up in the air.
  • Ian Rapoport from the Boston Herald has a great article up about Wes Welker and what his family does when they watch his game. He also has a feature up on James Sanders and Shawn Springs and what their return has done for the secondary.
  • Last night's high school scores are up at MBR.org.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Ian Rapoport talks Patriots

BigJab_new logo

Here is the Boston Herald’s New England Patriots Beat Writer discussing Wes Welker and Randy Moss

Friday, September 25, 2009

FRIDAY QUICK LINKS

Maine1

Monday, September 15, 2008

The First Meeting of the "Matt Cassel Fan Club"

This will be the first Monday morning meeting for the "Matt Cassel Fan Club". Without further ado here comes the president, Matty...

Matty: Thank you, thank you. It was a very successful day in Patriots Nation yesterday, as Matt Cassel did what he is supposed to do, not screw up. I will address questions and concerns now.

Drunk Guy In Back Pounding a Miller High Life 40 oz in a Brown Bag: Didn't you pick the Jets on your radio show yesterday to win the game?

Matty: Yes I did, however, I did it in the best interests of the MCFC and Pats Nation.

DGIBPAMHL40IBB: How is that in the best interests of MCFC and Pats Nation?

Matty: Well, to be honest, generally everything I touch turns to crap, and I became very concerned that becoming President of the MCFC would be detrimental to the young man's career and in turn, the Patriots. It's called reverse psychology.

DGIBPAMHL40IBB: (mutters an obscenity, burps, and then screams something about his fantasy football team losing by triple digits as he storms out of the room)

Matty: Ok then. The good out of yesterday-no turnovers, he seemed to have a good grasp of the short passing game and how to use Wes Welker, and the running game managed to take some pressure off. The negative-he under threw Randy Moss on a deep ball, and he must keep Moss involved in the game or risk him drifting. I give Cassel a B+ for his individual effort yesterday. That will now adjourn this week's meeting. I look forward to him throwing at least 2 touchdowns against Miami, keeping Randy Moss happy, and keeping the Pats in the win column. Until next Monday...

ShareThis

CMSB Search

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

Maine Sports Media is part of the CMSB Media Group. Not all thoughts and posts directly represent our sponsors, followers, or fans.